ACA Compliance Bulletin - Proposed Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2020
Proposed Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2020
Annual Limitations on Cost-sharing
The ACA requires non-grandfathered plans to comply with an overall annual limit—or an out-of-pocket maximum—on EHB. The ACA requires the out-of-pocket maximum to be updated annually based on the percent increase in average premiums per person for health insurance coverage.
- For 2016, the out-of-pocket maximum was $6,850 for self-only coverage and $13,700 for family coverage.
- For 2017, the out-of-pocket maximum was $7,150 for self-only coverage and $14,300 for family coverage.
- For 2018, the out-of-pocket maximum is $7,350 for self-only coverage and $14,700 for family coverage.
- For 2019, the out-of-pocket maximum is $7,900 for self-only coverage and $15,800 for family coverage.
Under the proposed rule, the out-of-pocket maximum would increase for 2020 to $8,200 for self-only coverage and $16,400 for family coverage.
Individual Mandate’s Affordability Exemption
Under the ACA, individuals who lack access to affordable minimum essential coverage (MEC) are exempt from the individual mandate penalty. For purposes of this exemption, coverage is considered affordable for an employee if the required contribution for the lowest-cost, self-only coverage does not exceed 8 percent of household income, adjusted annually, as follows:
- For 2015, the required contribution percentage was 05 percent of household income.
- For 2016, the required contribution percentage was 13 percent of household income.
- For 2017, the required contribution percentage was 16 percent of household income.
- For 2018, the required contribution percentage decreased to 05 percent of household income.
- For 2019, the required contribution percentage increased to 3 percent of household income.
Under the proposed rule, the required contribution percentage would increase in 2020 by 0.09 percent. The proposed rule provides that, for 2020, an individual would be exempt from the individual mandate penalty if he or she must pay more than 8.39 percent of his or her household income for MEC.
The 2018 tax reform bill, called the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, reduced the ACA’s individual mandate penalty to zero, effective beginning in 2019. As a result, beginning in 2019, individuals will no longer be penalized for failing to obtain acceptable health insurance coverage. However, despite this repeal, the proposed rule notes that individuals may still need to seek this exemption for 2019 and future years (for example, in order to be eligible for catastrophic coverage).
Direct Enrollment in the Exchanges
In an effort to provide greater flexibility in how consumers shop for health insurance coverage, the 2020 proposed rule would enhance direct enrollment through the Exchanges. Specifically, the proposed rule would expand opportunities for individuals to directly enroll in Exchange coverage by enrolling through the websites of certain third parties—called direct enrollment entities—rather than through HealthCare.gov. The proposed rule would implement several changes intended to streamline the regulatory requirements applicable to these direct enrollment entities.
Direct enrollment is a mechanism for issuers and web brokers to enroll applicants in Exchange coverage through a non-Exchange website in a manner that would be considered to be through the Exchange. Initially implemented for the 2019 plan year, the proposed rule would enhance the direct enrollment pathway to allow approved direct enrollment partners to host the Exchange eligibility application and enrollment service for Exchange applicants on their non-Exchange websites without redirecting to HealthCare.gov.
New Special Enrollment Period through the Exchanges
Under the Exchanges, certain special enrollment periods (SEPs) are available for people who lose health insurance during the year or experience other qualifying events. The 2020 proposed rule would establish a new SEP for off-Exchange enrollees who experience a decrease in household income and are determined to be eligible for the premium tax credit through the Exchange. This would allow enrollees to enroll in a more affordable Exchange plan when their household income decreases mid-year.
On Oct. 12, 2017, the White House announced that it would no longer reimburse insurers for cost-sharing reductions made available to low-income individuals through the Exchanges, effective immediately. Because Congress did not pass an appropriation for this expense, the Trump administration has taken the position that it cannot lawfully make the cost-sharing reduction payments.
In response to this, many issuers increased premiums in 2018 and 2019 only on silver level qualified health plans (QHPs) to compensate for the cost of those cost-sharing reduction payments—a practice sometimes referred to as “silver loading” or “actuarial loading.” Because premium tax credits are generally calculated based on the second-lowest-cost silver plan offered through the Exchange, “silver loading” has led to consumers receiving higher premium tax credits.
Because there has been no Congressional appropriation for the cost-sharing reduction reimbursements, the proposed rule requests comments on ways to address the practice of “silver loading” for future plan years. Any future guidance addressing this issue will not take effect prior to the 2021 plan year. Comments must be submitted by Feb. 19, 2019.
Source: Department of Health and Human Services
© 2019 Zywave, Inc. All rights reserved.